Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 29628

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : UC57 - UC61 Full Version

Effect of Preoperative Preconditioning of Patients with External Nasal Compression for Different Time Intervals on Emergence Agitation After Nasal Surgeries: A Randomised Controlled Trial


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63380.18371
Anupama Kumari, Anuja Agrawal

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, SBKS MIRC, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Emergency Medicine, SBKS MIRC, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Anuja Agrawal,
Bunglow Number 3, Glade Mercury, Behind Motnath Mandir, Near Cygnus School, Harni, Vadodara-390022, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: aanupama.kumary@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Emergence agitation is a commonly experienced phenomenon in the waking period of general anaesthesia, which can adversely affect the recovery of patients in the postoperative period. Patients undergoing nasal surgeries under general anaesthesia, involving postoperative nasal packing, tend to have a higher rate of emergence agitation after extubation. Non pharmacological methods like nasal clips, can be safe and cost-effective alternatives to pharmacological agents for controlling emergence agitation.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of preoperatively applying nasal clips for various durations in patients scheduled for nasal surgeries under general anaesthesia, which require nasal packing in the postoperative period, in reducing emergence agitation after extubation.

Materials and Methods: The present randomised controlled trial was conducted at department of Anaesthesia, Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre (SBKS MIRC) in Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. A total of 75 patients with ASA I and II, aged 18-65 years, posted for elective nasal surgeries under general anaesthesia with postoperative bilateral nasal packing, were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (25 patients) wore nasal clips for 30 minutes preoperatively, Group B (25 patients) wore the clip for 40 minutes preoperatively, and Group C (25 patients) served as the control group without nasal clips. At the time of extubation, the emergence agitation score, ability to cough, time to verbal response, respiratory rate, incidences of desaturation, laryngospasm, or any other complications were observed and noted by an anaesthetist who was unaware of the application of nasal clips preoperatively. All data statistically analysis were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows (version 21.0; IBM Corporation).

Results: All three groups were comparable (p>0.05) in terms of demographic profile, type and duration of surgery, and baseline haemodynamic parameters like Heart Rate (HR), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Oxygen Saturation (SpO2), and baseline Electrocardiography (ECG). Emergence agitation was significantly lower in Group A and B as compared to Group C (p-value=0.02). On comparing Groups A and B, Group B had a significantly lower incidence of emergence agitation (p-value=0.02). There were two cases of dangerous emergence agitation in the control group and one case in Group A while no cases were reported in Group B. Other parameters at extubation were comparable among all groups. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in Groups A and B in comparison to Group C.

Conclusion: The present study suggests that preoperative preconditioning with nasal clips for 40 minutes in patients undergoing elective nasal surgeries can be a useful and safe method to reduce postoperative emergence agitation.

Keywords

Emergence delirium, Extubation, General anaesthesia, Recovery period

Emergence agitation is a commonly encountered adverse phenomenon in the waking period of general anaesthesia. It is described as a short-term state of confusion that occurs immediately after arousal from general anaesthesia and lasts for approximately 15-30 minutes. Clinically, patients are perceived as ‘waking’ from anaesthesia but with disorientation, hallucinations, hypersensitivity to external stimuli, restlessness, and hyperactivity (1). It can also be described as a passive process with the gradual return of consciousness after discontinuing the administration of anaesthetic and adjuvant agents at the end of the surgical procedure (2). It is very satisfactory for an anaesthetist and the patient if this process of emergence from anaesthesia is smooth and pleasant. Unfortunately, it can be associated with undesirable complications like vigorous coughing, haemodynamic changes, and even mental status changes in the form of cognitive impairment (3). It has been reported that the incidence of emergence agitation at the time of recovery from general anaesthesia is approximately 19 percent in adult patients (3).

While its pathogenesis remains unclear, a higher incidence has been seen in Ear, Nose, Throat (ENT) surgeries, possibly due to a sense of suffocation during emergence from anaesthesia when intra-nasal packing is used postoperatively (2),(3). This may have adverse outcomes in the form of nasal sinus bleed, self-removal of catheters (drains, urinary catheter, Ryle’s tube, etc.), sudden increase in heart rate and blood pressure (which may precipitate myocardial ischaemia, cerebrovascular bleed), self-extubation (dangerous in difficult airway patients), aspiration of collected blood in the nasopharynx, and even negative pressure pulmonary edema (if the patient tries to forcibly inspire through a closed nasal airway). To control this, additional use of medications or physical restraints may be necessary (3),(4),(5). Nasal packing used after nasal surgery causes a significant increase in airflow resistance, leading to acute breathing difficulty in patients who predominantly breathe through their noses. Patients who are acclimatised to mouth breathing due to chronic nasal blockage caused by nasal pathologies like rhinosinusitis, nasal septum deviation, nasal polyps, and inferior turbinate hypertrophy, may experience less discomfort and emergence due to nasal blockage caused by nasal packing (6).

This observation led the authors to use a non pharmacological method in the form of nasal clips in the preoperative period to reduce postoperative emergence. The application of nasal clips simulates nasal obstruction and helps patients acclimatise to mouth breathing in the preoperative and postoperative periods (7). Good empathetic patient counselling, along with this technique, helps alleviate anxiety and apprehension in patients about surgery and anaesthesia. Nasal surgeries involve airway sharing between the surgeon and anaesthetist and are usually contaminated with blood, which requires awake extubation to maintain intact reflexes and prevent aspiration. However, this may intensify emergence agitation (2),(8). Various studies have been conducted in adults to decrease emergence agitation using pharmacological agents like dexmedetomidine, opioids, inhalational agents, propofol, remifentanil, etc. (3),(4). However, there are very few studies using non pharmacological methods to reduce emergence agitation in such cases (1),(7).

In the present study, patients were preconditioned with external nasal compression using nasal clips (commonly used in swimming) to induce acute nasal obstruction in the preoperative period for variable durations to reduce the incidence of postoperative emergence agitation.

Material and Methods

The present randomised controlled study was conducted at Department of Anaesthesia, Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre (SBKS MIRC) in Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. The trial protocol was registered in Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI) (CTRI/2021/12/038512) and approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (SVIEC/ON/MEDI/RP/21033). The study was conducted over a period of six months from December 2021 to August 2022, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Additional consent was obtained from one patient for photography of the application of the nasal clip, ensuring confidentiality and anonymity. The study aimed to evaluate patients undergoing various nasal surgeries, including rhinoplasty, septoplasty, septorhinoplasty, turbinoplasty, and functional endoscopic sinus surgery, under general anaesthaesia with bilateral nasal packing in the postoperative period.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated using Process Automation Software System (PASS) 15 (NVSS-National Vital Statistics System). Based on a pilot study and previous research (7), twenty patients per group showed to detect a 40 percent decrease in the incidence of emergence agitation, with a significance level of 0.05 and 80 percent power.

Inclusion criteria: To account for potential dropouts (patient refusal or surgery cancellation for any reason), 25 patients were included in each group.

Therefore, a total of 75 patients with ASA I and II, aged 18-65 years, posted for elective nasal surgeries under general anaesthesia with postoperative bilateral nasal packing (done by Otolaryngorhinology surgeons after nasal surgery), were randomly allocated into three groups (n=25 in each group) using a computer-generated method.

Exclusion criteria: Patients below 18 years or above 65 years, those refusing to participate, those with ASA III or higher, hepatic, renal, cardiac, or respiratory co-morbidities, bleeding disorders or coagulopathies, a history of smoking, Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2, or a history of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea were excluded from the study. Patients in whom laryngoscopy and intubation duration was prolonged (>3 minutes), multiple attempts were required, or trauma was caused to the airway were also excluded.

Study Procedure

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into the following groups:

(a) Group A (25 patients): Nasal compression for 30 minutes before induction of anaesthesia.
(b) Group B (25 patients): Nasal compression for 40 minutes before induction of anaesthesia.
(c) Group C (25 patients): No nasal compression before induction of anaesthesia.

A preanaesthetic checkup was done on the day of surgery, and baseline haemodynamic parameters were noted. After obtaining written informed consent and providing proper counselling, the patient’s nose was closed with a plastic nasal clip commonly used for swimming [Table/Fig-1-4]. All patients were instructed to breathe through their mouth and were observed by an anaesthesiologist in the recovery room who did not participate in data collection.

In the operating theatre, multipara monitors were applied, and baseline respiratory rate, pulse rate, Non Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), Oxygen Saturation (SpO2), and Electrocardiography (ECG) were recorded. An intravenous line was secured using an 18 G intravenous cannula, and intravenous fluids were started. Anaesthesia was administered by an expert anaesthesiologist who did not participate in data collection. Patients were premedicated with intravenous injection of glycopyrrolate 0.004 mg/kg and midazolam 0.025 mg/kg. General anaesthesia was induced with Injection nalbuphine (0.1 mg/kg) and propofol (2.0-2.5 mg/kg), and tracheal intubation was facilitated with injection succinylcholine (2 mg/kg). The endotracheal tube was fixed after confirming bilateral equal air entry by auscultation and capnography. Oropharyngeal packing was performed and then surgical positioning was given. Bilateral air entry equality was reconfirmed after positioning.

Anaesthesia was maintained with a mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide (50:50), isoflurane (1-1.5%), and an intravenous infusion of Injection Atracurium with a loading dose of 0.5 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 0.1 mg/kg/hr. Volume-controlled mode was used with ventilatory settings of a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg and a respiratory rate of 12-14/min to maintain an End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (ETCO2) level between 30-35 mmHg. All patients received Injection ondansetron 4 mg and injection paracetamol one gram intravenously approximately 15 minutes before the end of surgery. Standard monitoring, including electrocardiography, Non Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), Oxygen Saturation (SpO2), and capnometry, was maintained throughout the procedure. Towards the end of the surgery, isoflurane was tapered and infusion of injection atracurium was stopped. The oropharyngeal pack was removed, and oral suction was carried out. After confirming spontaneous efforts of the patient, muscle relaxant reversal was done with injection neostigmine 50 micrograms/kg and injection glycopyrrolate 10 micrograms/kg intravenously.

Following these steps, inhalational agents were turned-off (defined as ‘time 0’ in the emergence process) (7) and switched to 100% oxygen. At this time, patients were not disturbed but were asked to open their eyes through continual verbal orders. Other types of stimulation were prevented. Extubation was performed when patients exhibited adequate spontaneous tidal volume and were able to respond to verbal orders. Emergence was observed from ‘time 0’ until the patient’s discharge from the operation theatre to the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Agitation level during emergence period was evaluated using the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (RSAS), off (Table/Fig 5) [7,9] and the maximum agitation score for each patient was recorded. If the score was 5 or higher, incremental doses of 0.5-1 mg midazolam were administered until the patient became calm (score of 4 or less), and the total dose of midazolam was recorded. The ability to cough during emergence was assessed using a four-point numerical scale (10):

0=no cough.
1=single cough.
2=persistent cough lasting less than 5 seconds.
3=persistent cough lasting ≥5 seconds or bucking.

Duration from ‘time 0’ to first verbal response and extubation was recorded.

Emergence agitation (according to the RSAS) was assessed at extubation and then every five minutes for the first 15 minutes, and then every 15 minutes thereafter until discharge from the PACU. In severe cases of emergence agitation, physical restraint and intermittent doses of 1 milligram of midazolam were given based on the decision of the attending anaesthesiologist.

Twenty-four hours after surgery, patient satisfaction with recovery was assessed using a four-point numerical rating scale (7).

3=very satisfied.
2=satisfied.
1=neutral.
0=unsatisfied.

The primary outcome of the present study was the reduction in emergence agitation after extubation, defined as an RSAS score of atleast five immediately after extubation. The secondary outcomes were the need for rescue sedatives and the occurrence of immediate postoperative complications such as desaturation (SpO2 ≤90%), laryngospasm, and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous parametric data were presented as mean±SD, and categorical data were presented as the number of patients. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the three groups for quantitative parametric data. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for the analysis of quantitative non parametric data. The Chi-square (χ2) test was used to compare qualitative data. Continuous parametric data were presented as mean±SD, non parametric data as median (interquartile range), and categorical data were presented as the number of patients. The p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant, and p-values <0.001 were considered highly significant. All data manipulations and statistical analysis were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 21.0; IBM Corporation). The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram given (Table/Fig 6).

Results

Out of the 80 patients initially selected for the study, two patients had a Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2, and three patients declined to participate, so they were excluded from the study. Therefore, a total of 75 patients participated in the study, and all were able to complete the study without any dropouts (Table/Fig 6). All three groups were comparable (p>0.05) in terms of demographic profile, type and duration of surgery, and baseline haemodynamic parameters like HR, MAP, SpO2 and baseline ECG (Table/Fig 7), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Oxygen Saturation (SpO2), and baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) findings (Table/Fig 7).

The time to verbal response, time to extubation, respiratory rate at extubation, and grade of cough were comparable (p>0.05) among all groups (Table/Fig 8). There was one case of desaturation in Group A (nasal compression for 30 minutes) for a short duration after extubation, which was treated and resolved by administering 100% oxygen for a few minutes. Group C (control group) had one case of laryngospasm due to persistent trickling bleeding from the nasopharynx after extubation, which was resolved by proper oxygenation, suctioning, and nebulisation.

During and after extubation, patients were considered agitated if their Riker Sedation Score (RSS) was ≥5. Agitation was considered dangerous if the RSS was seven. Emergence agitation was noted at extubation and then every five minutes for the first 15 minutes, and then every 15 minutes thereafter until discharge from the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU). The emergence agitation score was significantly lower in Group B (40 minutes of nasal compression) throughout the period of extubation until 30 minutes in the PACU. After 30 minutes, the emergence agitation score was comparable in all groups (Table/Fig 9).

The overall incidence of emergence agitation was significantly lower in Group B (p=0.02) compared to the other groups. When comparing Group A and B, Group B had a significantly lower incidence of emergence agitation. There were two cases of dangerous emergence agitation in the control group and one case in Group A, while no cases were observed in Group B. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in Group A and B compared to Group C (p=0.02). The consumption of midazolam was significantly lower in Group B (p=0.005) (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

Emergence agitation is a postanaesthetic phenomenon that occurs during the early phase of general anaesthesia recovery. It is characterised by agitation, confusion, disorientation, and possible violent behaviour (1). This phenomenon not only poses risks to surgical outcomes and increases the rate of postoperative complications but also leads to a traumatic experience for the patient and decreases patient satisfaction after surgery (3).

Kim HJ et al., conducted a retrospective study to identify factors affecting the incidence of emergence agitation (2). They found that young age, recent smoking, sevoflurane inhalational anaesthesia, moderate to severe postoperative pain, presence of a tracheal tube, presence of a urinary catheter, and nasal packing in the postoperative period were associated with approximately a 5-fold increase in the incidence of emergence agitation in patients recovering from general anaesthesia. In some cases, severe agitation may require the administration of sedatives or the use of physical restraints. When a patient is recovering from anaesthesia, they are in a light plane of anaesthesia and are partially awake or disoriented/dissociated. In this state, the presence of an endotracheal tube and nasal pack can be significant causes of emergence agitation (2),(11).

In the present study, a non pharmacological method in the form of nasal clips was used to precondition patients with nasal obstruction and simulate the postoperative condition of bilateral nasal packing after nasal surgery. Patients who met the inclusion criteria and provided consent were either made to wear nasal clips for 30 minutes or 40 minutes before anaesthesia induction, and their emergence agitation was compared to a control group without nasal compression. All patients were then assessed for recovery parameters like time to verbal response, time to extubation, and grade of coughing (10). Emergence agitation was evaluated using the Riker sedation scale (7),(9), and any complications like desaturation and laryngospasm were noted. The demographic profile, baseline haemodynamics, and recovery parameters were comparable among all groups (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8). Emergence agitation was significantly reduced in Group B (40 minutes of nasal compression), leading to better patient satisfaction (Table/Fig 9).

Kasem A and Abdelkader A conducted a similar study using external nasal compression with nasal clips to reduce the incidence of emergence agitation. They provided nasal compression for 10 minutes and 30 minutes preoperatively and compared it to a control group without nasal compression (7). They concluded that there was a significant decrease in the incidence of emergence agitation in the group where nasal clips were applied for 30 minutes preoperatively.

Researchers like Kim SY et al., and Polat R et al., have studied the use of dexmedetomidine infusion to reduce emergence after nasal surgeries (4),(5). Kim SY et al., concluded that there was reduced emergence and improved quality of recovery after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia with intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion. Meanwhile, Polat R et al., compared dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion to reduce emergence agitation during recovery after nasal surgery and found that both drugs provided a smoother and haemodynamically stable emergence compared to the control group. However, remifentanil was superior to dexmedetomidine in decreasing the incidence of emergence agitation to 3.3% compared to 20% and 46.5% with the dexmedetomidine group and control group, respectively (5).

Another significant cause of emergence agitation is sevoflurane inhalational anaesthesia (12),(13),(14),(15). Although it provides excellent haemodynamic stability, rapid induction and emergence from general anaesthesia, it is associated with a higher incidence of emergence agitation due to its rapid washout from the circulation owing to its low blood solubility (12). Ke JJ et al., observed in their study that emergence agitation after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia can be significantly reduced by using total intravenous anaesthesia rather than inhalational anaesthesia (16).

In the present study, patients underwent general anaesthesia induction with intravenous induction agents and were maintained with isoflurane, which has a higher blood gas coefficient than sevoflurane (sevoflurane=0.65; isoflurane=1.4), causing slower recovery and less emergence (15). Although in the present study, emergence agitation was significantly reduced in both groups with nasal compression, it was found that nasal compression for a duration of 40 minutes was the optimum duration as it was more effective than 30 minutes and patients were comfortable wearing nasal clips for this duration. It is possible that patients may feel uncomfortable if they were made to wear nasal clips for a longer duration than 40 minutes. Further studies may be required to confirm the optimum duration of nasal compression preoperatively that could help patients acclimate comfortably to mouth breathing postoperatively. Moreover, the effectiveness of nasal compression should also be compared with various pharmacological adjuvants to reduce emergence agitation. Nasal clips may not completely replace a pharmacological agent for reducing emergence delirium, but if combined, they may help reduce the required dose of medication.

Limitation(s)

It was not possible to clearly document and quantify subjective or objective preoperative nasal obstruction in all patients. Additionally, the impact of different nasal packing types and materials on postoperative breathing difficulties could not be evaluated. The present study was performed in ASA I and II patients, and further studies need to be done to evaluate the role and benefits of nasal compression in high-risk patients.

Conclusion

Preconditioning patients to breathe orally preoperatively for 40 minutes in elective nasal surgeries with the help of nasal clips can be an easily available, cost-effective, and safe method to reduce emergence agitation after nasal surgery with postoperative nasal packing. It not only reduces the complication rate requirement of sedatives or restraints but also improves patient and doctor satisfaction after surgery.

References

1.
Xu H, Li X, Yang B, Shen Z, Li W, Zhou Y . Effects of preconditioning by nasal splint and mouth breathing on emergence delirium after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in Chinese adults: A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e033803. Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033803. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Kim HJ, Kim DK, Kim HY, Kim JK, Choi SW. Risk factors of emergence agitation in adults undergoing general anaesthesia for nasal surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;8(1):46-51. Doi: 10.3342/ceo.2015.8.1.46. Epub 2015 Feb 3. PMID: 25729495; PMCID: PMC4338091. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Fields A, Huang J, Schroeder D, Sprung J, Weingarten. Agitation in adults in the post-anaesthesia care unit after general anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018;121(5):1052e-58. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Kim SY, Kim JM, Lee JH, Song BM, Koo BN. Efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on emergence agitation and quality of recovery after nasal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:222-28. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Polat R, Peker K, Baran I, Bumin AG, Topçu GÇ, Dönmez A. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion in emergence agitation during recovery after nasal surgery: A randomized double-blind trial. Anaesthesist. 2015;64(10):740-46. Doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0077-8. Epub 2015 Sep 2. PMID: 26329913. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Acharya S, Mali L, Sinha A, Nanda SB. Effect of naso-respiratory obstruction with mouth breathing on dentofacial and craniofacial development. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal. 2018;8(1):22-27. [crossref]
7.
Kasem A, Abdelkader A. Preoperative external nasal compression: Does it decrease emergence agitation after nasal surgery? Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol. 2016;9:593-97. [crossref]
8.
Saxena A, Nekhendzy V. Anaesthetic considerations for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A narrative review, Journal of Head & Neck Anaesthesia. 2020;4(2):e25. Doi: 10.1097/HN9.0000000000000025. [crossref]
9.
Riker RR, Fraser GL. More accurate sedation-agitation scale grading. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(3):698. [crossref]
10.
Lee J, Lee YC, Son JD, Lee JY, Kim HC. The effect of lidocaine spray before endotracheal intubation on the incidence of cough and hemodynamics during emergence in children. Korean J Anaesthesiol. 2007;53(3):S1-S6. [crossref]
11.
Baftiu N, Krasniqi I, Haxhirexha K, Domi R. Survey about the extubation practice among anaesthesiologists in Kosovo. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(2):350-54. Doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.083. PMID: 29531602; PMCID: PMC5839446. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kim JH. Mechanism of emergence agitation induced by sevoflurane anaesthesia. Korean J Anaesthesiol. 2011;60(2):73-74. Doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.60.2.73. Epub 2011 Feb 25. PMID: 21390159; PMCID: PMC3049884. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Munk L, Andersen G, Møller AM. Post-anaesthetic emergence delirium in adults: Incidence, predictors and consequences. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60(8):1059-66. Doi: 10.1111/aas.12717. Epub 2016 Mar 10. PMID: 26968337. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Cascella M, Bimonte S, Muzio MR. Towards a better understanding of anaesthesia emergence mechanisms: Research and clinical implications. World J Methodol. 2018;8(2):09-16. Published 2018 Oct 12. Doi:10.5662/wjm.v8.i2.9. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Miller RD, Pardo M. Basics of Anaesthesia, 6 th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2011.
16.
Ke JJ, Zhan J, Feng XB, Wu Y, Rao Y, Wang YL. Effect of total intravenous anaesthesia vs volatile induction with maintenance anaesthesia on emergence agitation after nasal surgery: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(2):117-23. Doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.3097. PMID: 30489620; PMCID: PMC6440219.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63380.18371

Date of Submission: Feb 19, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 29, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 28, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 09, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 22, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com